A Canadian Energy Research Insititute economist thinks nuclear power could undercut the “dirty oil” hype
Reactors could contribute to an oil sands makeover
A four-fold increase in the penalty for carbon dioxide emissions will be necessary to make it worthwhile for companies to begin taking unaided action, McColl estimates. Current Canadian climate change policies, while still vague, suggest the carbon price will rise into the $60 range required to trigger cleanup investments in about 10 years.
The quadrupled emissions penalty is forecast to make investment attractive in “gasification” manufacturing of clean fuel and the next generation of atomic power plants, on top of CCS. Both additional approaches are expensive but projected to become competitive with the current cornerstone of thermal oil sands operations, natural gas, if the carbon price increases.
Technology is available to make synthetic gas from coal or charcoal-like coke left over by oil sands production, and dispose of carbon dioxide exhaust from the conversion process. Alberta’s initial package of subsidized emissions reduction projects includes a field trial of underground synthetic gas manufacturing in a Swan Hills coal deposit northwest of Edmonton.
Small, portable reactors are developing to make nuclear power a realistic option for a new source of electricity and heat in the oil sands, says McColl. He is an ardent advocate of atomic energy who has worked as a consultant on proposals for plants in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan.
His CERI team acknowledges that western Canadian communities, industry and governments are all wary of nuclear projects. “We recognize that the development path of these reactors would have to be slow and modest,” he says. The emissions cleanup scenario in Green Bitumen includes just enough use of the zero-emissions atomic source of heat and power by 2030 to whet industry and government appetites for more in the remote future.
“We can change the image of the oil sands,” McColl predicts. “But it’s going to take a long time. No individual party can do it on their own. It has to be a co-ordinated effort.”
Issue ContentsRelated Posts
Studying the intersection of oil, gas and wildlife in Alberta • February, 2011
Top energy sector talent defies easy labels • January, 2011
NEB gives Mackenzie gas five years to flow • December, 2010
The other alternative energy: natural gas • December, 2010
Suncor Energy Inc. begins work on an oil sands eyesore • December, 2010
The key to oil-patch longevity? A bit of love • December, 2010
The myth of the oil curse is alive and well • December, 2010
Opinion on Canada’s energy sector is sharply divided • November, 2010






