twitter icon
twitter icon
rss icon
linkd in icon

Political Penalty

A year after a contentious royalty hike, Alberta Tories saw corporate campaign donations nearly cut in half

February 02, 2009
Subscribe Email This Post Print This Post Bookmark and Share

“There was some very vocal reaction and there were certainly some oil and gas companies that didn’t contribute in 2008,” Campbell agrees. “But I believe the premier and his government made the right decisions and this party will deal with it.”

Tory finance director Patricia Godkin adds that the period between the last two Alberta elections was a very “strange time” in party politics. A leadership race with eight candidates, followed by a concerted effort to publicize the new chief, drained the pockets of supporters before the 2008 campaign, she suggests. “When you have change like that you are going to have ups and downs.”

The party officials reject any suggestion that the campaign donations mark a break in relations between the Tories and the oil industry. But Campbell also emphasizes that the Tories need to broaden their fundraising reach into other business sectors.

contributions by region

“There is a lot of talk about how Alberta has to diversify economically outside of the energy industry and this party too has to diversify from a focus on the energy industry,” he says. “Granted, it is our largest industry but there are other industries and there are other areas where this province is going to concentrate and we are going to have to change our fundraising approach to do that.”

Campbell declined to comment on the regional distribution of the funding, saying the party had not made those comparisons. He did say that the historical geographic balance saw 60 per cent of donations come from Calgary. The 2008 campaign nearly reversed the historical ratio, with Edmonton accounting for 54 per cent of the cities’ combined donations.

donations from calgary

Eric Miller, vice-president and general counsel for Nexen Inc., one of the energy firms that decreased its contribution, says the action results from a changed philosophy towards campaign donations and should not be interpreted as a political statement. “Historically we gave a little bit more to the Conservative party and then we leveled it off where everybody gets the same over the last three or four years.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Issue Contents

Related Posts

Recent posts by Patrycja Romanowska

Kitimat LNG faces Australian rivals • April, 2011

A West Coast LNG terminal will have to compete with gas from Down Under

Why building better cities matters • March, 2011

Smokestacks get the blame, but are Canadian cities the real climate culprit?

Why Europe is looking to Alberta on CCS liability • February, 2011

The fate of an industrial salve hangs on long-term responsibility for underground waste sites

Gazprom: A ‘dinosaur’ slow to react to global change • February, 2011

Russia’s state-controlled monopoly seems stuck in the 1950s

The (shale) revolution will be international • January, 2011

Gas is increasingly globalized as stockpiles of LNG come online

Buried hope in carbon capture and storage • December, 2010

Funding and political priorities remain potential roadblocks for initial schemes

How to exacerbate a fossil-fuel addiction • November, 2010

Start with oddball renewable energy targets

Poland emerges as a new frontier for shale gas • August, 2010

Stockpiles of the unconventional fuel are luring North American energy firms

Comments

  • digital editions