twitter icon
twitter icon
rss icon
linkd in icon

The Greenhouse Gas Czar

Former Syncrude Canada president Jim Carter leads the Alberta Carbon Capture and Storage Development Council

December 01, 2008
Subscribe Email This Post Print This Post Bookmark and Share

“For me it’s not so much about saving the planet. I’m not an environmental catastrophist,” Carter says. “I’m concerned about the planet. I’m also concerned about generating a society of opportunity where everybody participates in the good things like education, jobs and health care. For me it’s a case of helping to develop our energy resources responsibly to the fullest of our capabilities.”

Alberta Carbon Cleanup Schedule

July 2008: $2 billion commitment by the provincial government to carbon capture and storage project partnerships with industry
September 2008: preliminary expressions of interest
November 2008: detailed project applications
January 2009: a “roadmap” manual that includes suggestions for resolving policy issues such as responsibility for greenhouse gas disposal sites is due from Alberta Carbon Capture & Storage Development Council
March 2009: government to announce decisions on funding cleanup proposals
2009-18: piloting phase – three to five trial projects
supported by provincial funds cut annual carbon dioxide emissions by five to 10 million tonnes
2016-2028: transition phase – expanded pilot plants and initial network of carbon pipelines and disposal sites are to deepen annual emissions cuts to 30-40 million tonnes while reliance on government aid decreases
2025-50: commercialization phase – a fully operational capture and disposal grid will mature into a self-supporting business and eventually reduce annual emissions by 139 million tonnes
Source: Alberta CCS Development Council

He sounds a note of urgency. He tackles his environmental role with an air of rolling up his sleeves for brisk action on pushing a project with no time to waste because it is a complicated web of partnerships, regulatory approvals, construction and operations. By historical standards for implementing new industrial methods on a large scale, the cleanup target date of 2050 sets a tight schedule, says the oil sands veteran.

“The reality is these are very complex and expensive technologies,” Carter says. The current credit crisis and oil price gyrations do not create excuses for any delays, he adds.

To have a carbon capture and storage network capable of the provincial cleanup goal operating by 2050, he sets a target of 2015 for building prototype systems as pilot projects. New industrial technology requires extended field trials followed by time to design, build and take bugs out of full-sized versions.

“I don’t think we can afford to back off. We’re going to have to be diligent to be up and running by 2015. We can’t afford to move off to the sidelines just because the economy might be slowing down a bit,” Carter says.

The dollar value of reducing greenhouse gas exhaust – or the price of emissions, depending on who’s counting – remains “a huge unknown,” he says. He blames slow and uncertain starts by carbon credit markets, coupled with ill-defined national and international environmental policies that keep the area murky. “That’s part of what makes this so challenging. You’re setting out to make huge investments when you don’t know the price for the results. It’s a learn-as-you-go effort,” Carter says.

“It’s not unlike the early oil sands investments. It was really hard to justify them on the basis of the price of oil. It (the justification) was an idea that you needed to get into the business and learn how to develop them. We would not be in the position we are now if we had not had those brave, bold investments.”

Carbon capture and storage, including big pipeline systems to connect emission sources and geological storage sites, is the latest entry in a grand Canadian tradition of hybrid public and industrial works like the 19th- century railways, Carter suggests. “Sometimes there are these nation-building endeavors to move a country forward. This is like that.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Issue Contents

Related Posts

Recent posts by Gordon Jaremko

Studying the intersection of oil, gas and wildlife in Alberta • February, 2011

A unique fund helps biologists map industrial impacts on natural settings

Top energy sector talent defies easy labels • January, 2011

There is more to executives than suits and salaries

NEB gives Mackenzie gas five years to flow • December, 2010

The national regulator approves northern pipeline with “sunset clause”

The other alternative energy: natural gas • December, 2010

How abundant, low-cost natural gas could rewrite the energy playbook

Suncor Energy Inc. begins work on an oil sands eyesore • December, 2010

A tailings pond cleanup strategy 40 years in the making

The key to oil-patch longevity? A bit of love • December, 2010

Reflections from Canadian Association of Drilling Engineers founding member Leroy Field

The myth of the oil curse is alive and well • December, 2010

Decrying fossil fuel wealth recalls the old chestnut of western alienation

Opinion on Canada’s energy sector is sharply divided • November, 2010

From well-head to wheel well, Canadians remain ambivalent

Comments

  • digital editions