twitter icon
twitter icon
rss icon
linkd in icon

Reality check: Oil sands projects in Alberta have a history of disappointing openings

A humbling heritage of setbacks taught leaders in the early oil sands developments not to be cocky and to avoid rash promises

October 27, 2008
Subscribe Email This Post Print This Post Bookmark and Share

A quarter-century later, the next big oil sands event dealt out yet another reminder that the 140,200-square-kilometre northern bitumen belt is an unforgiving technical frontier. As the Athabasca Oil Sands Project started up the third mining and upgrader complex in early 2003, a fire caused $150 million in damages and set back production for months.

Then in May of 2006, the Syncrude plant again upheld the tradition of surprise reminders that the world’s 175-billion-barrel, second-biggest oil supply source after Saudi Arabia is anything but easily conquered. A ribbon-cutting ceremony for an $8.4-billion addition had to be moved off the plant site when a startup glitch in a sulphur removal subsystem vented smelly, potentially hazardous waste gas.

On the financial side, the newest projects are models of planning and cost control by traditional oil sands standards.

Construction inflation was held down at Horizon to 36 per cent, to $9.3 billion from an initial estimate of $6.8 billion. The price tag for Long Lake climbed about 70 per cent into a range of $5.8-$6.1 billion from the original budget of $3.4 billion, but even that escalation fell far short of the oil sands pioneers’ experience.

GCOS began as a $110-million proposal to produce 31,500 barrels a day. By the time the industry’s founding plant was completed after a seven-year regulatory and construction marathon, it grew to 45,000 barrels daily and costs more than doubled to $250 million.

Syncrude was an even longer epic told in much bigger numbers. The first construction application in 1962 called for a 100,000-barrels-daily plant forecast to cost $356 million. The production target stayed the same, but costs multiplied six-fold to $2.2 billion over the 16 years it took to sort out the ownership and get the project built.

The oil sands heritage includes a note of defiance instilled by experiences of founding the industry against economic, political and environmental odds.

Prized keepsakes of the pioneer generation – valued at least on par with vintage GCOS shares and medals – include T-shirts worn on the job at the pilot plant, known as Tar Island. Brave words silk-screened onto the cotton were directed towards oil sands critics.

Illegitimus non carborundum, said the Latin motto. To the workers who wore the shirts, who called themselves the Loyal Order of the Sons of Bitumen, the phrase meant, “Don’t let the bastards get you down.”

Pages: 1 2

Issue Contents

Related Posts

Recent posts by Gordon Jaremko

Studying the intersection of oil, gas and wildlife in Alberta • February, 2011

A unique fund helps biologists map industrial impacts on natural settings

Top energy sector talent defies easy labels • January, 2011

There is more to executives than suits and salaries

NEB gives Mackenzie gas five years to flow • December, 2010

The national regulator approves northern pipeline with “sunset clause”

The other alternative energy: natural gas • December, 2010

How abundant, low-cost natural gas could rewrite the energy playbook

Suncor Energy Inc. begins work on an oil sands eyesore • December, 2010

A tailings pond cleanup strategy 40 years in the making

The key to oil-patch longevity? A bit of love • December, 2010

Reflections from Canadian Association of Drilling Engineers founding member Leroy Field

The myth of the oil curse is alive and well • December, 2010

Decrying fossil fuel wealth recalls the old chestnut of western alienation

Opinion on Canada’s energy sector is sharply divided • November, 2010

From well-head to wheel well, Canadians remain ambivalent

Comments

  • digital editions